Gujarat High Court Denies AAP Leader's Plea to Delay Assault Trial
‘Attempt to delay trial’: Gujarat High Court rejects AAP state chief’s plea

Image: The Indian Express
The Gujarat High Court dismissed a plea by AAP Gujarat working president Chaitar Vasava, aimed at delaying his trial for allegedly assaulting forest officials. The court found the request to examine defense witnesses at this stage to be a last-ditch effort to derail proceedings, emphasizing the importance of a timely trial.
- 01Chaitar Vasava, the AAP Gujarat working president and MLA from Dediapada, is accused of assaulting forest officials and firing a weapon.
- 02The Gujarat High Court rejected his plea for examining defense witnesses, viewing it as an attempt to delay the trial.
- 03The court noted previous rejections of similar applications, including a dismissal by the Supreme Court.
- 04The prosecution argued that the plea compromised the integrity of the trial process.
- 05The case involves multiple accused, including Vasava's relatives and others from local villages.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Gujarat High Court has rejected a plea by Chaitar Vasava, the working president of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Gujarat, to examine certain defense witnesses at the closing stage of a criminal trial concerning an alleged assault on forest officials. The court deemed the request as a 'last-ditch effort' to delay proceedings. The allegations against Vasava include verbally abusing five forest officials and physically assaulting one, as well as firing a shot in the air to intimidate a forest officer. Justice DN Ray dismissed Vasava's criminal revision application, which sought to overturn a May 2025 sessions court order that had similarly rejected his plea. The prosecution argued that the application was an attempt to derail the trial, pointing out that Vasava had previously stated no witnesses were needed during his Section 313 statements. The court found merit in the prosecution's objections, highlighting the absence of prior proceedings in Vasava's petition. Ultimately, the court concluded that the apprehension of a compromised right to a fair trial was unfounded, allowing the trial to proceed without further delays.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision allows the trial to proceed without further delays, ensuring that justice is served in a timely manner.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think the court's decision will affect the outcome of the trial?
Connecting to poll...
More about Aam Aadmi Party
AAP MLA Jagroop Singh Gill Criticizes Party's Shift from Principles
The Times Of India • May 26, 2026

Kejriwal Encourages High Voter Turnout in Punjab Municipal Elections
Asianet Newsable • May 26, 2026

AAP's Victory in Narmada Signals Political Shift in Gujarat Ahead of 2027 Elections
Hindustan Times • May 26, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

&w=1200&q=75)



