The Karnataka High Court in Bengaluru ruled that educational expenses for children are variable and cannot be limited to a fixed amount, as they depend on the fee structure of the educational institution. Justice K Manmadha Rao stated that imposing an artificial cap would undermine children's welfare. This ruling emerged from a custody dispute involving a couple who married in 2006 and later relocated to the United States. Following allegations of infidelity, the husband sought custody of their two minor sons, while the wife requested a divorce. The family court had previously set interim maintenance at ₹40,000 per month and educational expenses at ₹60,000. The wife argued that this amount was inadequate and should be paid directly to the educational institution. The court agreed, mandating that the father bear the actual educational costs and distinguishing between educational expenses and maintenance, which covers daily sustenance. The court also adjusted the monthly payments to the children and the wife, ensuring both educational and maintenance needs are met adequately.