Supreme Court Petition Challenges Maryland's Concealed Carry Restrictions Post-Bruen Ruling
Pro-2A Group Makes Supreme Court Appeal Targeting Blue State’s Response To Concealed Carry Ruling
Dailycaller
Image: Dailycaller
The Supreme Court is set to review a petition challenging Maryland's new concealed carry laws, which impose strict restrictions following the 2022 Bruen decision. Filed by the Second Amendment Foundation and others, the petition argues that these laws infringe upon Second Amendment rights, particularly regarding carry bans in public spaces. The outcome could significantly impact concealed carry regulations across the U.S.
- 01The petition was filed by the Second Amendment Foundation along with several other organizations and private citizens.
- 02Maryland's Gun Safety Act of 2023 includes extensive restrictions on where firearms can be carried, including public transit and medical facilities.
- 03The petition argues that these restrictions are unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's Bruen decision.
- 04The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently struck down similar laws in New York, highlighting a legal divide between circuits.
- 05SAF officials claim that the new laws continue to infringe on Second Amendment rights despite the Bruen ruling.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court received a petition from the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and several allies challenging Maryland's new concealed carry laws, enacted after the landmark 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. This ruling invalidated New York's discretionary system for issuing concealed carry permits, prompting Maryland and other states to impose extensive restrictions. The petition argues that Maryland's 'Gun Safety Act of 2023' violates Second Amendment rights by banning firearms in numerous public spaces, including public transit, demonstrations, and medical facilities. It also criticizes the law's 'vampire rule,' which effectively restricts concealed carry on private property unless permit holders are invited. SAF officials contend that these laws are attempts to circumvent the Supreme Court's previous decisions, with SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut stating that they infringe on citizens' rights to bear arms. The legal landscape is complicated by a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which struck down similar restrictions in New York, creating a split in circuit court decisions that may influence the Supreme Court's deliberation on this issue. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for concealed carry laws nationwide.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the petition, it could lead to the invalidation of Maryland's restrictive carry laws, allowing greater freedom for residents to carry firearms in public.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should states impose restrictions on concealed carry permits following the Bruen decision?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



