Scientists across various fields are expressing alarm over a proposed rule from the White House that seeks to increase political control over scientific research funding. The rule would allow political appointees to approve grants, undermining the longstanding peer review process that has been essential for ensuring the scientific merit of research proposals. Critics argue that this change could severely limit the types of research conducted, particularly in areas such as climate science and addiction, which are vital for public health. Additionally, the proposed rule would ban federally funded research on diversity, equity, and inclusion, and halt international scientific collaborations. Experts like Kate Marvel and Diane Fishbein emphasize that politicizing scientific funding could lead to detrimental outcomes, including increased addiction rates and hindered scientific progress. The OMB defends the proposal as a means to enhance transparency in grantmaking. As the proposal undergoes a public comment period, researchers and institutions are mobilizing to voice their concerns, hoping to trigger Congressional review and protect the integrity of scientific research.