Chris Selley Critiques CBC's Latest Attempt at Humour
Chris Selley: Another pathetic CBC attempt at humour
National Post
Image: National Post
Context
The article discusses a new comedy series produced by CBC and APTN that employs prank interviews to address social issues. It contrasts this approach with more effective forms of satire that focus on well-known public figures.
What The Author Says
The author argues that CBC's latest comedy series is a misguided attempt at humour that targets lesser-known figures rather than prominent ones, ultimately falling flat.
Key Arguments
📗 Facts
- The CBC received over $13 million in federal funding for Indigenous-led productions.
- Lindsay Shepherd was involved in a controversy at Wilfrid Laurier University in 2017.
- Frances Widdowson has been accused of denying the impact of residential schools.
📕 Opinions
- Selley believes that the current CBC comedy series is a cheap imitation of effective satire.
- The author expresses disdain for targeting individuals who are not well-known, seeing it as a failure of creativity.
Counterpoints
Prank humour can be effective regardless of target fame.
Some argue that humour can resonate with audiences through relatable, everyday experiences, not just high-profile targets.
The show may raise awareness of lesser-known issues.
By focusing on less prominent figures, the series might highlight overlooked social issues and perspectives that deserve attention.
Cultural humour can evolve and adapt.
The notion of Canadian humour is subjective, and new comedic styles can emerge that challenge traditional norms and resonate with diverse audiences.
Bias Assessment
The author displays a strong critical stance towards the CBC's approach, potentially overlooking the value of diverse comedic expressions.
Why This Matters
The CBC recently allocated over $13 million in federal funding to Indigenous-led productions, making the success or failure of such projects significant for cultural representation and funding accountability.
🤔 Think About
- •Is it possible for humour to effectively address serious social issues?
- •Can targeting lesser-known individuals in comedy still yield meaningful commentary?
- •What defines Canadian humour, and how can it evolve?
- •Should comedy hold public figures accountable, or is it enough to entertain?
Opens original article on National Post
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Does comedy need to target high-profile figures to be effective?
Connecting to poll...
