Calcutta High Court to Hear Challenges Against Great Nicobar Project in June
Calcutta High Court to hear pleas against Great Nicobar project in June; overrules Centre’s objections
The Hindu
Image: The Hindu
The Calcutta High Court has dismissed the Indian government's objections to petitions challenging the Great Nicobar Island project, which is estimated to cost ₹92,000 crore (approximately $11.1 billion USD). The court will hear the case on June 23, focusing on alleged violations of the Forest Rights Act and the legitimacy of Gram Sabha consent.
- 01Calcutta High Court will hear petitions against the Great Nicobar project on June 23, 2026.
- 02Petitioner Meena Gupta argues that the project violates the Forest Rights Act.
- 03The court dismissed the government's claim that Gupta lacked standing to file the petitions.
- 04Concerns raised about the legitimacy of Gram Sabha consent for land diversion.
- 05The project, which includes an international port and airport, has faced opposition from local tribal communities.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Calcutta High Court has set a date for June 23, 2026, to hear a series of petitions challenging the Great Nicobar Island project, which is valued at ₹92,000 crore (approximately $11.1 billion USD). The court overruled the Indian government's objections regarding the standing of petitioner Meena Gupta, a retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer, who claims that the project violates the Forest Rights Act. Gupta has filed multiple petitions questioning the validity of Gram Sabha resolutions that consented to the diversion of forest land for the project, as well as the constitution of a sub-divisional committee under the same law. The court noted that Gupta has sufficient interest in the case, representing the vulnerable tribal community. The government argued that the project is of 'great national importance' and should not be challenged in public interest litigation, but the court maintained that significant projects must comply with existing laws and are subject to judicial review. The legitimacy of the Gram Sabha's consent has been questioned, particularly regarding the representation of the Nicobarese and Shompen tribes, who argue that their rights have not been adequately addressed. The project has received initial clearance but has faced backlash from local tribal councils, which claim they are under pressure to relinquish their ancestral lands.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision could significantly affect local tribal communities and their land rights, as well as the future of the Great Nicobar project.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support the Great Nicobar project despite the legal challenges?
Connecting to poll...
More about Union government
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




