During a recent hearing, the Supreme Court of India stated it respects the views of eminent authors and thinkers but cannot accept information from 'WhatsApp University'. This statement was made by Chief Justice Surya Kant and a nine-judge Constitution bench while discussing petitions regarding discrimination against women in religious places, particularly the Sabarimala Temple in Kerala. Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, representing the Dawoodi Bohra community, argued for the acceptance of knowledge from all sources. However, Justice B V Nagarathna humorously remarked that knowledge from 'WhatsApp University' should not be included. The court's ongoing discussions also reflect its challenges in defining essential versus non-essential religious practices, as highlighted by a previous ruling that lifted the ban on women aged 10 to 50 entering the Sabarimala Temple, deeming the ban unconstitutional.