Chandigarh Court Denies Bail to Man Accused of Spreading Misleading Content About PM Modi
Chandigarh court denies bail to Hyderabad-based man in case over misleading video

Image: The Indian Express
A Chandigarh court has denied bail to Hassan Mohiuddin Siddiqi, a 42-year-old man from Hyderabad, accused of disseminating misleading information about Prime Minister Narendra Modi on social media. The court emphasized the need to control such statements to protect the dignity of public figures.
- 01The court deemed the accused's actions a 'brutal assault on the dignity' of Prime Minister Modi.
- 02Siddiqi was arrested on April 25, 2023, and his bail application was dismissed on May 25, 2023.
- 03The prosecution claimed Siddiqi's posts promoted disharmony and public mischief.
- 04The court highlighted that the Right to Free Speech carries responsibilities and should not lead to defamation.
- 05The judge warned that unchecked social media posts could grant users a 'free licence' to damage reputations.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A Chandigarh court has rejected the bail application of Hassan Mohiuddin Siddiqi, a 42-year-old man from Hyderabad, who is accused of circulating misleading content about Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the social media platform X. The court, led by Additional Sessions Judge Rohit Watts, ruled that Siddiqi's actions constituted a 'brutal assault on the dignity' of the Prime Minister. Siddiqi was arrested on April 25, 2023, following an FIR at the Cyber Crime Police Station in Chandigarh. The prosecution argued that he conspired with others to disseminate scandalous information intended to harm Modi's reputation and promote public discord. The defense contended that Siddiqi merely sought verification of a video using an AI tool and did not intend to defame anyone. However, the court noted that the tweet in question, which claimed that US intelligence agencies had compromising videos of the Prime Minister, was misleading. The court emphasized that while free speech is a fundamental right, it is not absolute and comes with responsibilities. The judge concluded that granting bail would not serve justice, as the investigation is ongoing.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision reflects the legal stance on misinformation and its potential consequences in India, particularly regarding public figures.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What are your thoughts on the regulation of social media content?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

&w=1200&q=75)



