Delhi High Court Judge Initiates Contempt Proceedings Against AAP Leaders
'I Won't Be Scared': HC Judge Swarana Sharma Initiates Contempt Action Against Kejriwal
News 18
Image: News 18
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court announced contempt proceedings against AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal and others for allegedly defamatory social media posts related to the excise policy case. The judge emphasized the need to protect judicial authority from political pressure.
- 01Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma initiated contempt proceedings against Arvind Kejriwal and AAP leaders.
- 02The judge criticized social media posts as defamatory and contemptuous.
- 03She affirmed the judiciary's need to remain independent from political pressures.
- 04The court had previously dismissed recusal applications from the accused citing bias.
- 05Further orders on the contempt action will be issued after additional hearings.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has taken a strong stance against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal and other senior party leaders by initiating contempt proceedings. This action follows allegedly defamatory and contemptuous social media posts targeting both the judge and the court regarding the excise policy case. During the proceedings, Justice Sharma described the posts as 'extremely vilifying' and asserted that they represent a broader attempt to undermine judicial authority. She emphasized that the law of contempt is designed to protect the judiciary as an institution, not just individual judges. Justice Sharma stated, 'I won’t be scared of a political campaign against me,' reinforcing the court's commitment to uphold its integrity against external pressures. The judge had previously dismissed requests for her recusal from the case, asserting that unfounded claims of bias do not warrant withdrawal. The High Court is set to issue further orders on the contempt proceedings after additional submissions are heard.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This development underscores the judiciary's commitment to maintaining its authority and independence from political influence, which is crucial for the rule of law.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think political leaders should face legal consequences for their public statements about the judiciary?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


