Supreme Court Overturns Bail for Haldwani Riot Accused, Orders Surrender
‘Grave error’: Supreme Court reverses bail for Haldwani riot accused, orders surrender
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The Supreme Court of India has reversed a bail decision by the Uttarakhand High Court for two men charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in connection with the 2024 Haldwani riots. The court ordered Javed Siddiqui and Arshad Ayub to surrender within two weeks, citing a grave error by the High Court in granting them default bail.
- 01Supreme Court overturned bail granted by Uttarakhand High Court to two riot accused.
- 02Accused must surrender within two weeks or face custody by trial court.
- 03High Court's claim of sluggish investigation was deemed factually incorrect by the Supreme Court.
- 04Investigation included statements from 65 witnesses, contrary to High Court's assertion.
- 05Accused lost the right to seek default bail due to delay in filing their appeal.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On May 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of India set aside the Uttarakhand High Court's order granting default bail to Javed Siddiqui and Arshad Ayub, who are accused of involvement in the 2024 Haldwani riots. The Supreme Court ordered the two men to surrender to the trial court within two weeks. The High Court had previously granted bail on January 8, 2025, arguing that the investigation was incomplete and the chargesheet was not filed within the statutory 90-day period. However, the Supreme Court found that the High Court had made a 'grave error' in its assessment, noting that the investigation had proceeded with due diligence, including the recording of statements from 65 witnesses. The Supreme Court criticized the High Court's comments regarding the investigation's pace, stating that the claims of lethargy were unfounded. The apex court emphasized that the accused had waited too long to challenge the trial court's decisions, thus forfeiting their right to seek default bail. The case involves serious allegations of arson and rioting, including damage to public property and police stations.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The ruling reinforces the judicial process in handling serious criminal cases, ensuring that those accused of significant crimes cannot evade justice through procedural loopholes.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the judicial system adequately addresses the rights of accused individuals?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.

