&w=1200&q=75)
Israeli Expert Analyzes Potential US-Iran Nuclear Deal Outcomes
Obama-era nuclear deal may be best case scenario for US, Iran peace talks, Israeli expert warns
Image: Jpost
Avner Vilan, a former defense official, suggests that the best possible outcome for US-Iran relations regarding the nuclear issue may mirror the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). He warns that such a deal could inadvertently strengthen the Iranian regime while failing to address critical concerns about missile capabilities.
- 01Avner Vilan predicts that any agreement between the US and Iran may resemble the JCPOA, allowing Iran to refrain from advancing towards nuclear weaponry temporarily.
- 02The potential deal could include the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the release of Iranian funds, which may provide economic relief to Tehran.
- 03Vilan emphasizes that while addressing Iran's 60% uranium enrichment is crucial, it is not sufficient for a comprehensive nuclear agreement.
- 04He warns that economic relief from a deal could inadvertently strengthen the Iranian regime, undermining hopes for regime change.
- 05Vilan outlines three possible paths for US President Donald Trump regarding Iran: escalating military action, pursuing a staged agreement, or waiting, though he notes Trump seems disinclined to wait.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a recent interview, Avner Vilan, a former senior defense official and Iranian nuclear expert, expressed that the best achievable agreement between the US and Iran may resemble the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) established during the Obama administration. He indicated that while such a deal could temporarily halt Iran's progression towards nuclear weapons, it would not address critical issues related to Iran's ballistic missile capabilities. Vilan highlighted the urgent need for economic relief for Iran, which could include reopening the Strait of Hormuz and releasing Iranian funds held abroad. However, he cautioned that this economic assistance might inadvertently bolster the Iranian regime rather than weaken it. Vilan pointed out that addressing Iran's 60% uranium enrichment is vital but insufficient for a robust nuclear agreement. He outlined three potential strategies for US President Donald Trump: escalating military action, pursuing a phased agreement, or adopting a wait-and-see approach, noting that Trump currently seems averse to waiting. Vilan concluded by warning that the situation could change rapidly, potentially leading to renewed conflict.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The potential agreement between the US and Iran could significantly affect regional stability and economic conditions in the Middle East, particularly concerning oil prices and security in the Gulf.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What do you think about the potential US-Iran nuclear deal?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.