Father-Son Duo Arrested in ₹150 Crore Investment Fraud Case in Mumbai
Court sends father-son duo to EOW custody in ₹150-cr investment fraud
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
Rashmikant Thanawala and his son Dipen Thanawala have been remanded to Economic Offences Wing (EOW) custody until April 21 in connection with a ₹150 crore investment fraud. They allegedly promised investors fixed monthly returns but misappropriated funds through various channels, affecting over 50 investors.
- 01Rashmikant and Dipen Thanawala are accused of defrauding investors of over ₹150 crore.
- 02They promised returns of 2% per month but allegedly diverted funds instead of investing them.
- 03The court emphasized the need for thorough investigation to trace the flow of misappropriated funds.
- 04Initial payouts were made to build trust, but payments ceased around late 2025.
- 05The investigation may reveal international money transfers, including funds allegedly sent to Dubai.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A special court in Mumbai has placed Rashmikant Thanawala and his son Dipen Thanawala in the custody of the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) until April 21 as part of an investigation into a ₹150 crore investment fraud. The duo allegedly raised funds over nearly a decade by promising investors fixed monthly returns of 2% and gains from initial public offerings (IPOs). However, instead of investing the money, they are accused of siphoning it off through various firms and accounts, with some funds allegedly routed overseas, impacting more than 50 investors. The court noted that preliminary evidence suggested that investor funds were misappropriated and emphasized the need for custodial interrogation to trace the money flow and identify assets bought with the diverted funds. The case originated from a complaint by a group of investors who described the scheme as a systematic financial fraud, claiming that initial payouts were made to build trust before payments stopped around late 2025. The investigation is expected to uncover the full extent of the fraud, including the use of fake digital evidence to mislead investors.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The case highlights the risks associated with investment schemes promising high returns, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of similar schemes in the future.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe stricter regulations are needed to protect investors from fraud?
Connecting to poll...
More about Economic Offences Wing
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




