Thane Financial Advisor Sentenced for Breach of Trust, Fined ₹30 Lakh
Financial advisor gets 2-year RI, fined ₹30 lakh in breach of trust case

Image: Hindustan Times
A financial advisor, Mateshwar Rajpat Giri, was sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment and fined ₹30 lakh (approximately $36,000 USD) for criminal breach of trust in Thane, Maharashtra. He failed to return an investment of ₹51.5 lakh made by a woman after she lost her husband and brother in a road accident.
- 01The court found Giri guilty under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code for criminal breach of trust but cleared him of cheating charges.
- 02The woman invested her compensation money and proceeds from selling a shop with Giri, expecting a 12% annual return.
- 03Giri paid dividends until January 2021 but defaulted on the remaining balance of ₹32.46 lakh.
- 04The judge noted that Giri's initial payments indicated no dishonest intention at the start of the investment.
- 05Charges under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act were dismissed as the law was enacted after the alleged offence.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a significant ruling, a Thane court sentenced financial advisor Mateshwar Rajpat Giri to two years of rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹30 lakh (approximately $36,000 USD) for criminal breach of trust. The case arose when a woman, who had lost her husband and brother in a road accident, invested her entire compensation amount and proceeds of ₹51.5 lakh from selling a commercial shop with Giri between July 2017 and April 2018, expecting an annual return of 12% through mutual funds. Although Giri paid dividends until January 2021, he defaulted on the principal amount, leaving an outstanding balance of ₹32.46 lakh. The court found that while Giri had initially paid dividends, this did not indicate a dishonest intention from the start, leading to his acquittal on cheating charges. However, he was convicted under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code for breach of trust. The judge also noted that charges under the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act could not be applied, as the law was enacted after the alleged offence occurred.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This case highlights the risks associated with financial investments and the importance of due diligence when dealing with financial advisors.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
How confident are you in the regulation of financial advisors?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



