Public Comments on National Parks Reveal Anti-Trump Sentiments
National Parks Reporting Program Flooded With Hundred of Anti-Trump Messages

Image: Newsweek
The National Park Service's reporting system, intended for flagging anti-American content, was inundated with criticisms of President Donald Trump. Over 35,000 comments highlighted issues such as 'whitewashing' history and cuts to park funding, stemming from Secretarial Order 3431 aimed at revising historical narratives at national parks.
- 01The Department of the Interior released over 35,000 public comments related to Secretarial Order 3431, which aimed to revise historical narratives at national parks.
- 02Many comments accused Trump of 'whitewashing' American history and criticized cuts to National Park staffing and funding.
- 03Specific historical sites, such as Manzanar, were mentioned in comments addressing the sanitization of U.S. history.
- 04The order led to the removal of exhibits related to climate change, slavery, and LGBTQ+ rights, prompting lawsuits from advocacy groups.
- 05Public outcry resulted in some removed exhibits being reinstated after significant backlash.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The National Park Service's public comment system, designed to report anti-American content, was unexpectedly filled with critiques of President Donald Trump and his administration. Following the release of over 35,000 comments linked to Secretarial Order 3431, many submissions condemned Trump's approach to American history, accusing him of 'whitewashing' and 'sanitizing' historical narratives. Comments highlighted specific sites like Manzanar, where Japanese Americans were interned during World War II, and criticized cuts to National Park staffing and funding. The order itself aimed to ensure that public monuments reflect a positive portrayal of American history, resulting in the removal of various exhibits, including those addressing slavery and LGBTQ+ rights. This prompted legal action from advocacy groups who argued that the administration betrayed Congress's trust in managing national parks for public benefit. Some exhibits have since been reinstated due to public pressure, reflecting the contentious nature of how history is presented in national parks.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The removal of exhibits and signs at national parks has sparked significant public backlash and legal action.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What do you think about the changes to national park exhibits under the Trump administration?
Connecting to poll...
More about Department of the Interior
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


&w=1200&q=75)



