Panchkula Court Restrains BJP MP Rekha Sharma from Defamatory Remarks Against Bhajan Lal and Chander Mohan
‘Badmashi’ remarks against Bhajan Lal, Chander Mohan | Panchkula court restrains Haryana MP from making ‘defamatory’ statements
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
A Panchkula civil court has prohibited BJP MP Rekha Sharma from making potentially defamatory statements against former Haryana Chief Minister Bhajan Lal and his son, Chander Mohan. The court's decision aims to ensure a peaceful environment during the upcoming Panchkula Municipal Corporation elections.
- 01Court restrains Rekha Sharma from making defamatory remarks.
- 02Chander Mohan filed a civil suit against Sharma for her comments.
- 03Remarks made during a campaign event were deemed harmful to their reputation.
- 04Court emphasizes the importance of fair political criticism.
- 05Next hearing scheduled for August 7 for Sharma's response.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
A civil court in Panchkula, Haryana, has issued an order restraining BJP MP Rekha Sharma from making remarks that could be considered defamatory against the late Bhajan Lal, a former chief minister, and his son, Chander Mohan. The decision came after Chander Mohan filed a civil suit alleging that Sharma made serious allegations during a campaign event for the Panchkula Municipal Corporation elections, referring to them as 'badmash' and attributing their political success to 'badmashi.' The court, led by Civil Judge Arunima Chauhan, acknowledged that the comments could harm the reputations of both Mohan and his father, especially given the presence of dignitaries and media coverage at the event. While the defendant argued that her comments were merely critiques of the opposition's working style, the court determined that the potential for further defamatory remarks warranted immediate action. The court emphasized that this order does not limit Sharma's right to engage in fair political criticism. The case is set to continue with a hearing scheduled for August 7, where Sharma is expected to file her written statement and reply.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's ruling is intended to maintain a peaceful electoral environment and protect the reputations of political figures during the elections.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Should political candidates be held accountable for potentially defamatory remarks?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


