Madras High Court Halts Tamil Nadu Police's Order to Block Critical Social Media Posts
Madras High Court stays Tamil Nadu police’s notice to block 18 X posts critical of TVK
The Hindu
Image: The Hindu
The Madras High Court has temporarily stayed a Tamil Nadu Police notice demanding the removal of 18 social media posts critical of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) party and Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay. The court's decision came after a public interest litigation argued that the notice infringed on free speech rights.
- 01Madras High Court issued a stay on Tamil Nadu Police's notice to block 18 social media posts.
- 02The posts criticized the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) and Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay.
- 03A public interest litigation claimed the notice violated constitutional rights to free speech.
- 04The police notice was issued under the Information Technology Act and Digital Media Ethics Code.
- 05Concerns were raised about the lack of due process for account holders affected by the notice.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
On May 13, 2026, the Madras High Court in Tamil Nadu, India, stayed a notice from the Cyber Crime Wing of the Tamil Nadu Police that sought to block 18 social media posts deemed provocative and politically sensitive. These posts were critical of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) party and Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay. The interim stay was granted following a public interest litigation filed by P. Chockalingam, president of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad in North Tamil Nadu. The petitioner argued that the police notice, issued under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008, infringed upon the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The notice claimed that the posts could incite public unrest and disrupt law and order, but the petitioner contended that the affected account holders were not informed of the allegations against them and were denied a chance to respond. This situation raises significant constitutional concerns regarding free speech and procedural fairness in regulating online content.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling supports the protection of free speech on social media, allowing for open discussions without undue censorship.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the government should have the authority to block social media posts?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



