Arvind Kejriwal Withdraws from Delhi Excise Policy Case Amid Concerns of Judicial Impartiality
Arvind Kejriwal writes to Delhi HC judge, declines to participate further in excise policy case proceedings
The Economic TimesImage: The Economic Times
Arvind Kejriwal, leader of the Aam Aadmi Party, has decided to withdraw from the proceedings of the Delhi Excise Policy case after the Delhi High Court dismissed his plea for the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma. He cites concerns over perceived bias and the integrity of the judicial process as reasons for his decision.
- 01Kejriwal's withdrawal follows the dismissal of his recusal plea by the Delhi High Court.
- 02He expresses concerns about the impartiality of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.
- 03Kejriwal frames his decision as a peaceful protest based on conscience.
- 04The Delhi High Court emphasized that allegations of bias must be substantiated by evidence.
- 05Kejriwal may challenge the recusal order in the Supreme Court.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Arvind Kejriwal (chief of the Aam Aadmi Party) has written to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court, announcing his decision to withdraw from further proceedings in the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-22 case. This decision comes after the court dismissed his plea for the judge's recusal, stating that his allegations did not meet the legal standards for bias and were based on conjecture rather than evidence. Kejriwal's letter expresses his respect for the judiciary but raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the judge's associations and her children's roles with the Union Government. He frames his withdrawal as a form of peaceful protest, invoking Mahatma Gandhi's principles of satyagraha, and emphasizes the importance of public perception of justice. Despite acknowledging that this decision may adversely affect his legal interests, he remains prepared to accept the consequences. The case, which involves allegations against Kejriwal and others by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), will continue in the High Court without his participation, highlighting ongoing tensions surrounding judicial impartiality and the necessity for substantiated claims of bias.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Kejriwal's withdrawal could influence public perception of the judicial process in politically sensitive cases, potentially affecting ongoing legal proceedings and trust in the judiciary.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judges should recuse themselves in cases with perceived bias?
Connecting to poll...
More about Aam Aadmi Party
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




