The Supreme Court of India has clarified that there is no absolute prohibition on the Allahabad High Court granting bail to an accused whose bail was previously cancelled by the apex court. However, such a decision must be supported by strong reasoning, demonstrating a change in circumstances or fresh grounds not considered earlier. This clarification emerged from the case of Jeeshan, who was accused of attempting to murder and intimidating witnesses connected to a murder case. The Supreme Court set aside the Allahabad High Court's bail order, citing it as a 'manifest error of law.' The court emphasized that bail orders must reflect thorough reasoning rather than merely stating the facts. Jeeshan had previously absconded for 42 days before surrendering, raising concerns about his potential to flee and tamper with evidence. The apex court highlighted the serious nature of the allegations, indicating that the case involved premeditated attempts to terrorize witnesses. Consequently, the Supreme Court cancelled Jeeshan's bail and ordered him to surrender immediately.