Suleman Usman Bakery Case: Delayed Testimonies and Critical Evidence Issues
Suleman Usman Bakery trial continues in fits and starts
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The trial of six policemen accused of murdering eight unarmed Muslims during the 1992-93 riots in Mumbai continues to face delays, with key witness Dr. A G Shinde testifying only three times over three years. The case highlights significant evidence issues, including the destruction of original post-mortem reports crucial to the prosecution.
- 01Dr. A G Shinde's testimony took over three years to complete due to repeated adjournments.
- 02The original post-mortem reports of the victims were destroyed in 2005, complicating the case.
- 03The Srikrishna Commission's findings contradict the defense, indicating victims were shot while fleeing.
- 04Dr. Shinde faced challenges from defense lawyers attempting to discredit his post-mortem procedures.
- 05The case underscores ongoing issues of accountability in police actions during communal riots.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Suleman Usman Bakery trial, which involves six policemen accused of murdering eight unarmed Muslims during the 1992-93 riots in Mumbai, has been marked by significant delays and critical evidence challenges. Dr. A G Shinde, a key witness who performed the post-mortems, took over three years to complete his testimony, managing to testify only three times due to frequent adjournments. Despite his health issues, including Parkinson’s disease, Shinde traveled from Kolhapur for each court appearance, often returning without testifying. The raid on the bakery occurred on January 9, 1993, amidst the post-Babri Masjid demolition riots, and all victims had no criminal records. Originally, 18 policemen were charged with murder, but many were discharged, and three have since died. Notably, original post-mortem reports crucial to the case were destroyed in 2005, which has complicated the prosecution's efforts. The Srikrishna Commission's investigation into the riots indicated that victims were shot while attempting to flee, contradicting the defense's narrative. Dr. Shinde defended his post-mortem methods against attempts to discredit him during the trial.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The trial's delays and evidence issues may hinder justice for the victims' families and impact public trust in law enforcement.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the police should be held accountable for actions during communal riots?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




