Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of FCI Employee Over Bribery Allegations
‘Dereliction’ of duty: Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds compulsory retirement of Food Corporation of India employee
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of Om Parkash, a Food Corporation of India employee, due to supervisory lapses in a bribery case. The court ruled that his misconduct warranted strict action, emphasizing the serious nature of his duties related to food grain consignments.
- 01The court found the penalty of compulsory retirement appropriate given the sensitive nature of the employee's duties.
- 02Justice Sandeep Moudgil stated that dereliction of duty in food grain acceptance is serious misconduct.
- 03The court dismissed claims of procedural unfairness in the disciplinary inquiry.
- 04Om Parkash's defense argued that no evidence supported the bribery allegations against him.
- 05The court emphasized that disciplinary actions should only be interfered with if they are perverse or irrational.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld the compulsory retirement of Om Parkash, a technical assistant at the Food Corporation of India (FCI), due to his involvement in a bribery case. Justice Sandeep Moudgil stated that the penalty was justified due to the serious nature of Parkash's duties concerning the acceptance of food grain consignments. The court emphasized that 'dereliction' of duty in this context is a grave misconduct warranting stringent action. Parkash had challenged the review order from October 20, 2023, arguing that the disciplinary action was based on unproven allegations and that he had an unblemished service record since his appointment in September 2014. However, the court found no procedural unfairness in the inquiry and dismissed his plea, stating that the findings were not perverse and that the penalty did not shock the court's conscience. The case stemmed from a complaint alleging illegal gratification for facilitating rice consignments, leading to a trap where money was recovered from a private individual instead of Parkash. The court upheld the disciplinary actions taken against him, reinforcing the importance of accountability in such sensitive roles.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling reinforces the accountability of public servants in maintaining integrity, particularly in sensitive roles involving food safety and quality.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe strict disciplinary actions are necessary for public servants in sensitive roles?
Connecting to poll...
More about Food Corporation of India
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




