Supreme Court's SIR Ruling Sparks Criticism from Congress Leader Singhvi
SC's SIR judgment raises more questions than it answers: Singhvi

Image: Asianet Newsable
Abhishek Manu Singhvi, a Congress leader, criticized the Supreme Court's ruling on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, stating it has raised numerous questions about the Election Commission's implementation and the process of determining citizenship. He highlighted concerns over the haste of the revision process and flaws in the Election Commission's actions.
- 01Singhvi emphasized that the SIR's validity was not in question, but rather the method and intent behind its implementation.
- 02He raised concerns about the removal of 7.5 crore individuals from electoral rolls based on citizenship before final decisions were made.
- 03Singhvi pointed out significant flaws in the Election Commission's implementation, particularly in Bihar, where transparency was only achieved through civil society interventions.
- 04The Congress leader criticized the rushed timeline for the SIR process, questioning the Election Commission's motives for conducting it in such a short period.
- 05The Supreme Court clarified that the Election Commission's role does not include determining citizenship status.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi expressed strong concerns regarding the Supreme Court's recent judgment that upheld the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. He stated that while the ruling confirmed the legal validity of SIR, it raised numerous questions about the Election Commission of India's (ECI) implementation of the process. Singhvi argued that the focus should be on the substance and intent behind the SIR, rather than merely its constitutional validity. He highlighted issues surrounding the removal of 7.5 crore individuals from electoral rolls based on citizenship, emphasizing that such actions should be determined by the competent authority under the Citizenship Act, not the ECI. Furthermore, Singhvi criticized the Election Commission for significant flaws in its implementation, particularly in Bihar, where transparency was only achieved through civil society efforts. He also condemned the hasty timeline of the revision process, questioning why such important work was done in a rushed manner. The Supreme Court's ruling stated that the ECI's powers are limited to determining eligibility for electoral rolls and do not extend to citizenship status.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Supreme Court's ruling and the subsequent criticisms may influence future electoral roll revisions and the processes surrounding voter eligibility in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
What do you think about the Supreme Court's ruling on the Special Intensive Revision?
Connecting to poll...
More about Election Commission of India

Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah Faces Pressure to Resign; Supreme Court Supports Election Commission's Authority
Deccan Herald • May 27, 2026

Union Law Minister Affirms Continuation of Special Intensive Revision Amid Opposition
Asianet Newsable • May 27, 2026

Supreme Court Affirms ECI's Role in Bihar Electoral Rolls, Limits Citizenship Determination
Asianet Newsable • May 27, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



