The ongoing debate about the terminology of 'Hindu' versus 'Sanatan Dharma' highlights a significant discourse about the historical identity of Hindu civilization. Critics who claim that 'Hindu' is a modern construct ignore substantial historical evidence that showcases the ancient recognition of this identity. Scholars such as Upinder Singh point out that terms like 'India' and 'Hindu' derive from the Indus River, with ancient texts from various cultures acknowledging the existence of Hindus. Despite this, some, including American Indologist Wendy Doniger, question the appropriateness of the term 'Hinduism', arguing that it was not always self-identified by its practitioners. However, the historical context suggests that the identity has persisted regardless of the name. Furthermore, figures like Amartya Sen assert that Buddhism was the dominant religion in India for centuries, yet this perspective often neglects the philosophical and historical connections between Hinduism and Buddhism. The article contends that while modern Hindu supremacism is problematic, the solution lies not in denying the term 'Hindu' but in acknowledging the rich historical tapestry of Hindu civilization.