Karnataka High Court Rules Wife's Separation Due to Husband's Affair is Justified
‘Justified withdrawal’: Karnataka High Court rules wife leaving husband over his extramarital affair is not desertion
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
The Karnataka High Court ruled that a wife's separation from her husband over his alleged extramarital affair is considered 'justified withdrawal' rather than desertion. This ruling emphasizes that a spouse should not be compelled to cohabit with a partner engaging in infidelity, marking a significant stance on marital rights.
- 01The court defined 'justified withdrawal' in cases of extramarital affairs.
- 02A spouse cannot be forced to remain in an unreasonable or unsafe cohabitation.
- 03The ruling overturns a previous family court decision granting divorce based on uncorroborated claims.
- 04The court emphasized the need for corroborative evidence in marital disputes.
- 05Allegations of serious health issues must be substantiated to qualify as mental cruelty.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Karnataka High Court has asserted that a wife's decision to separate from her husband due to his alleged extramarital affair constitutes 'justified withdrawal' rather than desertion. In a ruling dated April 28, the bench of Justice Suraj Govindaraj and Justice Dr. Chillakur Sumalatha stated that if a spouse's conduct makes cohabitation unreasonable, the other partner cannot be compelled to stay. This ruling came in response to a wife's appeal against a 2016 family court decision that granted her husband a divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The family court had accepted the husband's claims while dismissing the wife's defense due to lack of documentary evidence. However, the High Court found that the wife had been compelled to leave due to her husband's alleged ill-treatment and affair, which included the birth of a child from that relationship. The court emphasized that a claim for divorce based on desertion cannot be upheld if the claiming spouse is in breach of matrimonial obligations. The ruling also highlighted the necessity for corroborative evidence in allegations of cruelty and infidelity, stating that uncorroborated testimony is insufficient for legal determinations. The High Court has remanded the case for reconsideration, ensuring both parties have the opportunity to present their evidence appropriately.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling may empower spouses facing infidelity to seek separation without fear of being labeled as deserters, potentially changing how marital disputes are adjudicated in India.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the law should protect spouses in cases of infidelity?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.


