The preprint server arXiv has announced a new policy to combat the influx of AI-generated content that does not meet academic standards. Violations will lead to a one-year ban from submitting to the platform, alongside a requirement for peer review for any future submissions from the banned authors. Thomas Dietterich, an emeritus professor at Oregon State University and a member of arXiv's editorial advisory council, highlighted the importance of maintaining the integrity of scholarly communication. He stated that submissions must adhere to rigorous standards, including well-prepared sections, figures, tables, and references. This initiative comes in response to the growing presence of AI-generated inaccuracies in scientific literature, which have included fake citations and nonsensical diagrams, raising concerns about the quality and reliability of published research. The policy aims to ensure that only credible and meticulously prepared content is shared on arXiv, reflecting the platform's commitment to uphold academic standards. As the influence of AI continues to grow in academia, such measures are crucial for preserving the integrity of scientific discourse and preventing misinformation from permeating peer-reviewed literature.