arXiv Implements Ban on Submissions of AI-Generated Hallucinations
Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

Image: Ars Technica
The preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated content that fails to meet scholarly standards. Violators will face a one-year ban and future publications will require peer review. This policy aims to uphold the integrity of scientific communication amid rising concerns over AI-generated inaccuracies.
- 01Submissions containing AI-generated inaccuracies will result in a one-year ban from arXiv.
- 02Future submissions from banned authors will require peer review before being accepted.
- 03Thomas Dietterich, an emeritus professor and arXiv advisory council member, announced the policy via social media.
- 04The new rules are part of arXiv's commitment to maintaining standards of scholarly communication.
- 05Submissions must include well-prepared sections, figures, tables, and references to comply with arXiv's standards.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The preprint server arXiv has announced a new policy to combat the influx of AI-generated content that does not meet academic standards. Violations will lead to a one-year ban from submitting to the platform, alongside a requirement for peer review for any future submissions from the banned authors. Thomas Dietterich, an emeritus professor at Oregon State University and a member of arXiv's editorial advisory council, highlighted the importance of maintaining the integrity of scholarly communication. He stated that submissions must adhere to rigorous standards, including well-prepared sections, figures, tables, and references. This initiative comes in response to the growing presence of AI-generated inaccuracies in scientific literature, which have included fake citations and nonsensical diagrams, raising concerns about the quality and reliability of published research. The policy aims to ensure that only credible and meticulously prepared content is shared on arXiv, reflecting the platform's commitment to uphold academic standards. As the influence of AI continues to grow in academia, such measures are crucial for preserving the integrity of scientific discourse and preventing misinformation from permeating peer-reviewed literature.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you support stricter regulations on AI-generated content in academic publishing?
Connecting to poll...
More about ArXiv
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.








