NCLAT Clarifies SFIO Investigation Authority Lies with Central Government
NCLT can't order SFIO probe, power with Centre: NCLAT ruling
Asianet Newsable
Image: Asianet Newsable
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) cannot directly order an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). Instead, the power to initiate such investigations rests with the Central Government under the Companies Act, as clarified in a recent ruling.
- 01The NCLAT modified the NCLT's direction for an SFIO investigation, referring the matter to the Secretary of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs instead.
- 02The ruling emphasized that the Central Government holds the discretion to refer matters to the SFIO under Sections 212 and 213 of the Companies Act.
- 03The NCLAT upheld findings of fraudulent transactions against the appellants, noting misleading financial practices.
- 04The Tribunal found that the sale of shares in a Singapore subsidiary was misrepresented in financial statements until 2022.
- 05Suspended directors were criticized for their lack of cooperation and failure to explain the transfer of sale proceeds.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a significant ruling, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) clarified that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) does not have the authority to directly order an investigation by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). Instead, this power is vested in the Central Government under the Companies Act. The NCLAT modified a previous NCLT order and referred the investigation to the Secretary of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, who can appoint inspectors to investigate the matter according to legal procedures. The Bench, comprising Justice Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan and Technical Member Naresh Salecha, highlighted that the discretion to refer matters to the SFIO lies solely with the Central Government. Additionally, the NCLAT upheld findings of fraudulent transactions by the appellants, noting that the alleged sale of shares in a Singapore-based subsidiary was misleadingly reflected in the company's balance sheets until 2022, thereby misleading creditors. The Tribunal also criticized the suspended directors for their non-cooperation during the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling impacts the regulatory landscape for corporate fraud investigations in India, clarifying the authority and processes involved.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe the Central Government should have the sole authority to initiate SFIO investigations?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.