In Karnataka, India, the ongoing voter mapping under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) has raised concerns among transgender persons about potential exclusion from electoral rolls. Many individuals in this community have updated their identities following the Supreme Court's 2014 NALSA judgment, which recognized transgender persons as a third gender. However, discrepancies between older official documents and newer identity records pose a significant barrier. For instance, school certificates and birth records may still reflect their names and genders assigned at birth, while updated documents, like Aadhaar cards, show their affirmed identities. The SIR requires documents to establish citizenship, yet transgender identity certificates are not included in the accepted documentation, further complicating the situation. Many transgender individuals, such as Christy Raj and Harshitha, have faced familial rejection, resulting in lost access to vital documents and a lack of knowledge about their families' voter registrations. This reality makes it nearly impossible for them to meet the progeny mapping requirements, which depend on connections to their disowned families. The situation highlights the urgent need for a clear mechanism to address these discrepancies and ensure the rights of transgender individuals in the electoral process.