Delhi HC Judge Denies Kejriwal's Recusal Request in Liquor Policy Case
‘Put in Catch-22 situation’: Delhi HC judge rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea in excise case
The Indian Express
Image: The Indian Express
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has rejected a recusal plea from former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case related to the excise policy. Justice Sharma emphasized the need for judicial independence and dismissed allegations of bias as unfounded, stating that personal attacks on judges threaten the integrity of the judicial system.
- 01Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma refused to recuse herself from the case against Arvind Kejriwal and others.
- 02The judge criticized the recusal application as lacking evidence and motivated by media narratives.
- 03Justice Sharma highlighted the importance of judicial independence and the dangers of yielding to public perception.
- 04Kejriwal's claims of bias were dismissed as speculative, particularly regarding Justice Sharma's family connections.
- 05The case stems from a corruption investigation linked to the Delhi government's liquor policy.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court has denied a recusal request from Arvind Kejriwal, the former Chief Minister of Delhi and leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), in a corruption case involving the alleged liquor policy scam. Justice Sharma stated that the recusal applications lacked substantive evidence and were instead filled with insinuations and doubts regarding her impartiality. She expressed that accepting such applications would set a troubling precedent, undermining the credibility of the judiciary. The judge emphasized that personal attacks on judges are attacks on the institution itself and asserted that judges should not be swayed by public opinion or media narratives. Kejriwal's concerns about a conflict of interest due to Justice Sharma's children being panel counsel for the government were deemed unfounded. This case follows a trial court's earlier decision to discharge all accused, including Kejriwal, in February, prompting the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to challenge this ruling. The court has stayed the trial court's recommendations for departmental action against the investigating officer, highlighting the complexities and implications of the ongoing legal proceedings.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The court's decision to deny the recusal could influence public perception of judicial impartiality and the integrity of ongoing investigations into political figures.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe judges should recuse themselves in cases involving political figures?
Connecting to poll...
More about Central Bureau of Investigation

Delhi High Court Judge Denies Kejriwal's Recusal Request in Liquor Policy Case
Ndtv • Apr 20, 2026

Delhi High Court Judge Rejects Kejriwal's Recusal Request Amid Allegations of Bias
Hindustan Times • Apr 20, 2026

Delhi High Court Judge Rejects Recusal Plea in Liquor Policy Case Amid Controversy
News 18 • Apr 20, 2026
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




