Allahabad High Court Affirms Use of 'Hon'ble' for Constitutional Functionaries
HC: Constitutional functionaries entitled to ‘Hon’ble’ honorific
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Allahabad High Court ruled that constitutional functionaries in India, including MPs, judges, and ministers, are entitled to the honorific 'Hon'ble'. However, civil servants, regardless of rank, do not qualify for this title. The ruling clarifies the protocol surrounding the use of honorifics in official communications.
- 01Constitutional functionaries like MPs and judges are entitled to the honorific 'Hon'ble'.
- 02Civil servants, regardless of their rank, cannot use this honorific.
- 03The ruling was made by a division bench of the Allahabad High Court.
- 04The court addressed a specific case involving the omission of 'Hon'ble' in an FIR.
- 05The use of honorifics is important in maintaining protocol for official communications.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that constitutional functionaries, including Members of Parliament (MPs), judges, and ministers, are entitled to the honorific 'Hon'ble'. This decision was made by a division bench comprising Justice JJ Munir and Justice Tarun Saxena, emphasizing that those exercising sovereign functions within the government must be addressed with this title in all communications. The court clarified that civil servants, regardless of their rank, do not have the right to use the honorific. This ruling arose from a case in which the Uttar Pradesh Police failed to include 'Hon'ble' before the name of an MP in an FIR, prompting the court to seek clarification on the protocol. The court reiterated that the honorific should be reserved for constitutional functionaries and accepted counter-affidavits from the state and respondent counsel regarding the matter. The case was part of a plea seeking to quash proceedings related to criminal intimidation and breach of trust involving the former Union minister's name, which was mentioned in the FIR without him being named as an accused.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling reinforces the importance of protocol in official communications, ensuring that constitutional functionaries are properly addressed, which may affect how government officials are recognized in legal documents.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think honorifics should be used for all government officials?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




