Allahabad High Court Imposes ₹15 Lakh Fine on Husband for Suppressing Facts in Maintenance Case
Allahabad HC slaps ₹15L costs on man for suppressing facts in maintenance case against wife
Hindustan Times
Image: Hindustan Times
The Allahabad High Court in Prayagraj has dismissed a maintenance petition filed by a husband, imposing a ₹15 lakh fine for suppressing facts and misusing his wife's loans. The court highlighted the husband's deceitful behavior, including diverting funds for personal luxuries, while his wife worked to support them.
- 01The Allahabad High Court dismissed a maintenance petition as vexatious.
- 02A fine of ₹15 lakh was imposed on the husband for suppressing material facts.
- 03The husband concealed a prior maintenance order and misused his wife's loans.
- 04The wife has been paying substantial EMIs for loans taken by the husband.
- 05The court ordered the district magistrate to investigate the husband's assets.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court in Prayagraj dismissed a maintenance petition filed by a husband, labeling it as 'vexatious' and 'born out of pretences.' Justice Vinod Diwakar imposed a ₹15 lakh (approximately $18,000 USD) compensatory cost on the husband for suppressing material facts in his affidavits and subjecting his wife to financial hardship. The court found that the husband, a practicing advocate, had concealed a previous maintenance order in his favor and misappropriated personal loans taken from his wife's salary for personal luxuries, including alcohol. The couple, married on May 18, 2019, faced disputes shortly after marriage, leading to multiple litigations. The wife, employed as an additional private secretary, was burdened with repaying loans fraudulently taken by her husband. The court mandated that the husband pay the fine within six weeks and directed the district magistrate in Etawah to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue if not paid. Additionally, an inquiry into the husband's assets was ordered to ensure compliance with the court's terms.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This ruling highlights the legal consequences of financial deceit in marriage, potentially influencing future cases involving spousal support and financial misconduct.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think financial transparency should be mandated in marriage?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




