James Comey Indicted Over Alleged Threat Against Trump in Instagram Post
What did James Comey say about Trump? Ex-FBI chief indicted over ‘86 47’ Instagram post
Hindustan TimesImage: Hindustan Times
Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted in North Carolina for a social media post deemed a threat against President Donald Trump. The post featured seashells arranged to read '86 47,' which prosecutors argue implies intent to harm. Comey denies wrongdoing, claiming the message was political.
- 01James Comey was indicted over a social media post interpreted as a threat against President Trump.
- 02The post included seashells arranged to read '86 47', which prosecutors claim suggests intent to harm.
- 03Comey denies any wrongdoing, stating the post was meant as a political message.
- 04His lawyer plans to seek dismissal of the case, citing 'selective and vindictive prosecution.'
- 05Trump responded to the indictment, labeling Comey as 'crooked' and suggesting the post could be interpreted as a threat.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
James Comey, the former FBI Director, has surrendered to authorities following an indictment in North Carolina related to a 2025 Instagram post. The post featured seashells arranged to spell '86 47', which prosecutors allege could be interpreted as a threat against President Donald Trump, the 47th president of the United States. The Justice Department argues that this message constitutes a serious expression of intent to harm the President. Comey has denied any wrongdoing, asserting that he viewed the post as a political statement rather than a call for violence. After receiving backlash, he deleted the post and clarified his stance against violence. During a brief court appearance, Comey did not enter a plea, and his lawyer, Patrick Fitzgerald, indicated plans to seek dismissal of the charges, claiming the prosecution is politically motivated. President Trump criticized Comey, calling him 'crooked' and suggesting that '86' is widely understood as a violent term.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
This case raises questions about political speech and the boundaries of social media expression, particularly for public figures.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you believe social media posts by public figures should be subject to legal scrutiny?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.




