The Supreme Court of India ruled that courts cannot initiate reforms in religion during a review of the Sabarimala case. Senior advocate Indira Jaising argued for the relevance of religion, citing the 2018 verdict that allowed menstruating women to enter the temple in Kerala.

• 01The Supreme Court stated that it cannot reform religious practices.
• 02Indira Jaising represented women who entered Sabarimala temple, advocating for their right to worship.
• 03The 2018 verdict allowed menstruating women aged 10-50 to enter the temple.
• 04The review involved a nine-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant.
• 05The discussion centered on the relevance of religion in modern society.

This ruling could affect the rights of women in religious practices across India, potentially leading to further discussions on gender equality in religious contexts.