Unveiling Anthony Blunt: The Queen's Art Historian and His Espionage Legacy
The Queen's man who spied for Russia ... and the Nazis

Image: Mail Online
Anthony Blunt, once a trusted art historian for Queen Elizabeth II, was revealed as a Soviet spy and a potential informant for the Nazis. Despite confessing to MI5 in 1964, his treachery remained hidden from the Queen for years, raising questions about his motivations and the extent of his betrayal.
- 01Blunt served as the Surveyor of the Queen’s Pictures and played a role in facilitating her marriage to Prince Philip.
- 02He was part of the infamous Cambridge spy ring, which included Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean.
- 03Blunt confessed his espionage activities to MI5 in 1964, but the Queen was not informed until 1979.
- 04Evidence suggests Blunt leaked Allied military plans to the Nazis in 1944, resulting in significant British military losses.
- 05Piers Blofeld's book utilizes newly declassified MI5 documents to provide a detailed account of Blunt's espionage.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In his new book, *Master of Lies*, author Piers Blofeld delves into the life of Anthony Blunt, an art historian who served Queen Elizabeth II and was later exposed as a Soviet spy. Blunt, who had once embraced communism during his time at Cambridge in the 1930s, became disillusioned with Stalin's regime but continued to operate in high society. His role as the Surveyor of the Queen’s Pictures allowed him unprecedented access to the royal family, raising eyebrows when he was revealed as 'the fourth man' of the Cambridge spy ring in 1979. Despite confessing to MI5 about his espionage activities in 1964, the secret was kept from the Queen for another decade. When she was finally informed, she reportedly did not express outrage, likely due to Blunt's assistance in her marriage to Prince Philip. Furthermore, new evidence suggests that Blunt may have also provided crucial military information to the Nazis during World War II, leading to the deaths of thousands of British servicemen. Blofeld's exploration of Blunt's treachery raises profound questions about loyalty and betrayal, leaving readers to ponder the motivations behind such a quintessentially English figure's actions.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
How should historical figures involved in espionage be judged?
Connecting to poll...
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.



