Google Defends AI Music Training Under YouTube's Terms of Service in Copyright Lawsuit
YouTube Terms of Service Allow AI Music Training, Google Says in Copyright Lawsuit

Image: Billboard
Google asserts that YouTube's terms of service allow the training of AI music models on user-uploaded content, responding to a lawsuit from independent artists alleging copyright infringement. The case highlights ongoing tensions between AI development and copyright law in the music industry.
- 01Google's motion to dismiss claims YouTube's terms grant a broad license for AI training on uploaded music.
- 02The lawsuit targets Google's Lyria 3 AI music model, which allegedly used songs without artist compensation.
- 03YouTube's terms allow a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license for uploaded content.
- 04Licensing agreements with major music companies may restrict AI training differently than individual uploads.
- 05The lawsuit aims to represent all indie artists harmed by Google's AI practices.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
In a recent court filing, Google argued that YouTube's terms of service provide a broad license for training AI models on music uploaded to the platform. This statement was made in response to a copyright infringement lawsuit from independent artists against Google's Lyria 3 AI music model, which they claim was trained on their music without compensation. Google contends that the terms allow for a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license for content usage, including for derivative works. The case is significant as it may set a precedent for AI training practices in the music industry, particularly concerning the rights of independent artists. The lawsuit, which is a proposed class action, includes notable plaintiffs such as singer-songwriter Sam Kogon and the band Directrix. As the legal landscape evolves, the outcomes of this case and others like it will impact how AI technologies interact with copyright law in music.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
The outcome of this lawsuit could redefine how independent artists are compensated for their work used in AI training, affecting their revenue and rights.
Advertisement
In-Article Ad
Reader Poll
Do you think AI companies should pay artists for using their music?
Connecting to poll...
More about Google
Read the original article
Visit the source for the complete story.






