Supreme Court justices are increasingly vocal about the lengthy nature of oral arguments, which have stretched to an average of 90 minutes despite being scheduled for 60 minutes. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito have criticized the trend, citing excessive speechifying and a lack of direct questioning. The justices' concerns reflect a broader debate on the effectiveness and efficiency of the court's argument sessions. During the pandemic, a shift to virtual hearings led to a more structured questioning format based on seniority, which some justices prefer to retain. However, this has resulted in longer exchanges, with the longest argument this term lasting nearly three hours. While some justices, like Clarence Thomas, appreciate the extra time to engage with attorneys, others, particularly from the liberal bloc, tend to dominate discussions. Legal experts warn that the current format may reduce transparency and accessibility, complicating the court's public perception. The justices' discussions are crucial for the court's legitimacy, as they provide insights into their deliberative processes on cases with significant national implications.